Dustin Locke (University of Michigan)
"A Defense of Ramseyan Humility"
In his unpublished paper ÒRamseyan Humility,Ó David Lewis argues that Òwe are
irremediably ignorant about the identities of the fundamental properties that
figure in the actual realization of the true final theoryÓ. Three authors (Rae
Langton, Jonathan Schaffer, Ann Whittle) have independently argued that even if
we accept the metaphysical and linguistic assumptions of LewisÕ argument, we
need not accept his epistemic conclusion. This paper defends Lewis against
these authors by, first and foremost, offering a much-needed clarification of
LewisÕ conclusion and his argument for it.